Here's an interesting quote I read from a discussion on a mailing list:
"Cults are leader-centric. Religions are institutional- and doctrine-
centric, with leadership being essentially disposable."
It makes a lot of sense, actually.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think cults can certainly become religions, if they get over the initial "cult of personality" stage. I think the main difference between the two is that a religion can last a long time, while a cult will fade away with the leader, and that's why this difference is important. The key to lasting a long time is to not rely on the survival of an individual.
BTW, I think a good example of such a transition is the Mormons. Initially it was a cult based around Joseph Smith, but eventually they managed and thrived without him. It seems to me that Wicca is a modern example of this: it was initially just Gardner dancing around naked, but the whole idea has grown far beyond any individual practitioner.
Post a Comment